Legal insurance, horizontal unbundling and access to justice
February 8, 2012 at 10:37 pm mgramatikov 1 comment
Research from the Netheralnds (van Velthoven and Klein Haarhuis, 2009) showed that people who have insurance against legal expenses are more likely to report experiences with legal problems. Several explanations are possible here. First, those who are more likely to get into legal trouble might be more willing to purchase an insurance policy. Alternatively, one might think that people who are insured will have less hesitations to proceed to solve their legal problems simply because they face less uncertainties in terms of costs. Or simply those who are insured have more motivations to prove to themselves and to others that the investment in insurance policy was worth it.
“Those unexpected twists could be a driver’s license issue, problems with the sale or purchase of a vehicle, an accident-related benefits dispute and more.
What if:
- You’re faced with a traffic ticket that you believe was wrongly assessed?
- The replacement value of your vehicle is quoted far below what you believe it’s worth@
- Your local repair shop does a terrible job and you’re stuck with a bill and a vehicle that still isn’t working properly?”
Which other areas of law can we deem as candidates for unbundling? Consumer and employment disputes, family matters? In developing countries one might thing of problems related to land tenure and food security.
Entry filed under: Access to Justice.
1. Legal insurance, horizontal unbundling and access to justice | Free Lawyer Advice | February 10, 2012 at 5:22 am
[…] Research from the Netheralnds (van Velthoven and Klein Haarhuis, 2009) showed that people who have indemnity against legal expenses are more likely to report experiences with legal problems. Several explanations are possible here. First, those who are more likely to get into legal distress might be more willing to buy an indemnity policy. Alternatively, one […] Read More […]